There's a few ways you "might" achieve this, this is just one. Initialization is the process of preparing an instance of a class, structure, or enumeration for use. Okay, so that makes no sense, you have a class which is a container for some data, some of which is optional (either you have an image or a video), why not supply two different initialisers for the two different use cases. Oh Ok so essentially since my class is of type AVPlayerViewController then I'll find an init from that one. AVPlayerViewController does not have an init (type:) initializer (that exists on your subclass). If the chunk is missing (or invalid), then the chunk 3 server will read the data needed to rebuild the missing chunk and push it. Your init (type:) initializer needs to call one of the init methods of the superclass AVPlayerViewController. Legacy Constructor Violation: Swift constructors are preferred over legacy convenience functions. Burns, Engineer & Constructor Swift's Rosario Captain C. I do not want to have to initialize the class as the values going into it vary (sometimes a video and sometimes a image) < Swift Each chunk will look to its neighbors (ie chunk 3 looks at 2 and 4). THE FIRST MEAT SHIPMENT FROM THE SWIFT PLANT AT SALADILLO ROSARIO Following.
0 kommentar(er)
